AgricultureID

Commodity · Pulse commodity

Lentils

Also known as: Masur, Lens seed, Red lentils, Green lentils

Lentils are the flat, lens-shaped dry seed of Lens culinaris, traded by cotyledon colour and seed size. Whether a lot is sold whole with its coat on or dehulled and split into a fast-cooking product is the decision that defines the market it enters.

Dated referenceLast reviewed: 2026-07-13Updated: 2026-07-13
Illustrative diagram · AgricultureID (original)

Lentils are traded as a pulse whose commercial identity rests on two independent attributes: the colour of the cotyledons inside the seed and the size of the seed itself. A lentil with red cotyledons under a brown coat looks brown on the outside — and the moment the coat comes off, it is a red lentil. The commodity’s naming follows what the buyer will see, which is not always what the seller is looking at.

This makes processing form central rather than incidental. Whole lentils retain their coat and their shape and hold up in dishes where they must stay intact. Dehulled and split lentils cook fast and break down, and that behaviour is the point — it is what soups, dals, and purées require. The same field can supply either market, but the lot has to be directed, and the processing is what creates the article.

Colour, size, and what the buyer sees

Cotyledon colour is the primary division. Red lentils dominate the dehulled and split trade; green and yellow types serve the whole-lentil markets, and the large green types are a distinct premium article valued for holding shape. Within each colour, size is specified — large green, small green, and the various red calibres — and it drives both price and cooking behaviour.

Whole, football, and split

Three forms reach buyers, and they are distinct commodities in practice. Whole lentils keep the coat. Dehulled whole lentils — known in parts of the trade as footballs — have the coat removed while the two cotyledons remain joined. Split lentils have been separated into individual cotyledons and cook fastest of all.

Milling outturn governs the economics: what a processor cares about is how much of the intake emerges as whole splits rather than as chips, broken fragments, and powder. Outturn depends on seed condition, uniformity, and moisture at milling, so a lot’s value to a miller is not readable from its appearance as delivered.

AgricultureID does not currently publish split lentil or lentil flour entries; these pathways are real and are described here rather than linked.

Quality and defects

Lots are described by size, colour, and uniformity, and by moisture, splits and chipped seed, and foreign material. Because the lentil is thin and flat, it chips at the edges under handling stress in a way rounder pulses do not, and chipped seed is a graded defect. Weathering in the field stains coats and downgrades whole-lentil lots, though it matters less to a lot heading for dehulling — another instance where the destination determines whether a characteristic is a defect at all.

Insect damage, and bruchids in particular, is a rejection issue in export trade rather than a discount, and phytosanitary requirements differ by destination market.

Storage and handling

Lentils are handled gently: their flat shape makes them prone to chipping and splitting when dropped or conveyed hard, and every chip is a graded defect or a lost split. Over-dry seed is brittle and breaks; moist seed moulds and invites insects. Storage is kept cool, dry, and monitored, with insect protection, and hermetic systems are used where bruchid pressure warrants.

Relationships

Evidence-backed connections in the knowledge graph.

Scope & limitations

Geographic scope: Global. Size conventions, grade standards, phytosanitary rules, and classification codes are jurisdiction-specific and versioned.

  • This is a reference description of the traded pulse, not a grading determination, contract specification, or customs classification.
  • No size, moisture, milling-outturn, or defect-tolerance figures are given here — standards and contracts set them.
  • Class and calibre names differ between producing and consuming markets; the same lot may be described differently in each.
  • Regions are indicative groupings rather than ranked producers, and colour-class geography is not distinguished.

Sources

This article draws on the following authoritative sources. See our sources & methodology for how they are selected.

  1. [1]FAO — Food and Agriculture Organization (opens in a new tab)

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

    Authoritative

    Cited for: Lentils as a traded pulse and their processing forms

    Type:
    Intergovernmental organization
    Jurisdiction:
    Global
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  2. [2]FAOSTAT — FAO statistical database (opens in a new tab)

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

    Authoritative

    Cited for: Commodity item classification and coverage

    Type:
    Intergovernmental organization
    Jurisdiction:
    Global
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  3. [3]USDA — U.S. Department of Agriculture (opens in a new tab)

    United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)

    Authoritative

    Cited for: Lentil grading attributes and market class context

    Type:
    Government agency
    Jurisdiction:
    United States
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  4. High

    Cited for: Lentil dehulling, splitting, and milling context

    Type:
    Research institute
    Jurisdiction:
    India
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12

Reported trade, 2022

What reporting countries declared to FAO for Lentils; dry (FAOSTAT item 201, CPC 01704) in 2022. A dated snapshot of one dataset — not a current or authoritative measure of this market.

Missing from this ranking: Russian Federation

  • Russian Federation reported 80,969.57 t of Lentils; dry exports in 2021 — rank 7 among reporters that year — but did not report exports for 2022. It is therefore absent from the 2022 table below.

A country absent from a reference year is not a country with zero trade. Read the ranking below as “largest reporters that declared in 2022”, not as “largest traders”.

Top reporting exporters12 of 92 reporters that declared exports of Lentils; dry in 2022, descending by quantity.
ReporterQuantity (t)Value (1000 USD)Flags
Canada1,892,282.991,638,942A 91
Australia1,045,356.06751,959A 27
Türkiye499,141.18537,051A 122
United Arab Emirates354,952.93389,612A 91
United States of America173,291.74161,824A 67
Djibouti121,183.59122,285A 6
Kazakhstan89,699.2658,110A 20
India64,891.4768,843A 80
Belgium17,313.0722,417A 38
Myanmar14,393.3210,300A 8
Argentina11,824.89,066A 6
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)10,621.3517,914A 49
Top reporting importers12 of 155 reporters that declared imports of Lentils; dry in 2022, descending by quantity.
ReporterQuantity (t)Value (1000 USD)Flags
India646,755.93535,601A 7
Türkiye508,591.05414,638A 23
United Arab Emirates433,326.06399,211A 26
Pakistan144,363.7137,673A 10
Iran (Islamic Republic of)138,823.89182,497A 10
Sri Lanka132,377.35125,090A 10
Djibouti129,919.86115,583A 12
Ethiopia111,748.1478,272A 9
United States of America85,688.1887,795A 21
Colombia76,996.1982,486A 4
Saudi Arabia60,242.5862,884A 23
Canada58,680.9754,556A 40 · I 4
A
Official figure
I
Value imputed by a receiving agency

Counts are the number of partner rows carrying each flag in the reporter’s total. A flag not listed for a reporter had no rows.

World totals, 2022

Reporter and partner codes >= 5000 are FAOSTAT aggregates (World, Western Europe, …) and are EXCLUDED. World totals here are recomputed by summing real reporters, not read from FAOSTAT’s own "World" row.

Reported exports (t)
4,357,883.02
Reported imports (t)
3,336,294.2
Reported export value (1000 USD)
3,877,261
Reported import value (1000 USD)
3,214,720

Mirror gap: -23.4%

Reported world imports and reported world exports of the same commodity disagree by 23.4% of reported exports by quantity — importers reported less than exporters reported shipping. This disagreement is a property of the data, not an error in it: the two sides are independent declarations by different customs authorities, and re-exports can count a consignment more than once along its route.

Scope & limitations

Reported trade statistics describe what reporting countries declared, not what physically moved. Reporter and partner figures for the same flow routinely disagree, re-exports can double-count a consignment along its route, low-value and informal trade is under-reported, and historical values are revised. Figures here are a versioned snapshot of one dataset, not a current or authoritative measure of a market.

Bilateral partner-level rows are summed over partners to a reporter total per item-year-flow. No interpolation, gap-filling, or estimation is applied; missing reporter-years are simply absent.

FAO. FAOSTAT Detailed Trade Matrix. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Source: FAOSTAT — Detailed Trade Matrix (Trade_DetailedTradeMatrix_E_All_Data_(Normalized)) (opens in a new tab). Licence: CC BY 4.0 (opens in a new tab). Dataset version 2025-12-18, retrieved 2026-07-16. Values are nominal US dollars as reported, not deflated.