AgricultureID

Defects

Post-harvest defects & deterioration

Harvested produce is alive and it fails in characteristic ways — bruised, chilled, sprouted, rotted, or eaten. This section documents those failures, what conditions cause them, and — critically — why what you can see is not the same as what you know.

Appearance is a clue, not a diagnosis

Visual symptoms alone do not confirm a cause. Post-harvest disorders frequently resemble one another, and some hazards — mycotoxin contamination in particular — can be present without any visible sign. Confirmation requires appropriate laboratory testing and qualified advice.

This matters in both directions. Many disorders look alike: chilling injury, freezing injury, and simple senescence can present similarly; blue mould and grey mould are routinely confused; an insect exit hole and a mechanical puncture are not always distinguishable by eye. And some of the most consequential problems are invisible — a lot with no visible mould can still carry mycotoxins, and chilling injury often only appears once the produce is warmed again, long after the decision that caused it.

Every entry therefore carries an explicit statement of what visual inspection cannot establish, and what confirmation actually requires.

How defects are grouped

  • Mechanical — impact, compression, abrasion during handling.
  • Physiological — the produce’s own metabolism going wrong (chilling injury, sprouting, scald).
  • Pathological — fungal and bacterial decay.
  • Entomological — insect feeding and contamination.
  • Chemical / handling — heat damage, taint, and process-induced faults.

See post-harvest operations for the processes that reduce these defects, and quality attributes for what is measured.

Defects A–Z

Each entry covers what the defect is, the conditions that cause it, the commodities affected, what it is confused with, the processes that reduce it, and the limits of visual diagnosis.

26 entries

Sources

This article draws on the following authoritative sources. See our sources & methodology for how they are selected.

  1. [1]USDA ARS — Agricultural Research Service (opens in a new tab)

    USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS)

    Authoritative

    Cited for: Post-harvest disorders and storage research

    Type:
    Government agency
    Jurisdiction:
    United States
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  2. [2]FAO — Food and Agriculture Organization (opens in a new tab)

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

    Authoritative

    Cited for: Post-harvest deterioration and loss

    Type:
    Intergovernmental organization
    Jurisdiction:
    Global
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  3. [3]EFSA — European Food Safety Authority (opens in a new tab)

    European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

    Authoritative

    Cited for: Mycotoxin and food-safety context

    Type:
    Government agency
    Jurisdiction:
    European Union
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12