Post-Harvest Defect · Post-harvest defect
Pitting
Also known as: Surface pitting, Skin pitting, Pit development
Pitting is the appearance of small sunken depressions in the skin where groups of cells beneath have collapsed. It is a symptom name rather than a disorder: chilling injury, pathogens, physical handling, and controlled-atmosphere injury all produce it, and in tropical and subtropical produce chilling injury is much the most common cause.
Pitting describes a shape, not a cause. Small depressions form in the surface of a fruit or vegetable where a group of cells immediately beneath the skin has collapsed, and the skin, no longer supported, sinks into the void. The pits may be scattered or dense, shallow or deep, discrete or coalescing into larger sunken areas, and they frequently darken as the exposed tissue browns. That single geometry — a localised collapse under intact or near-intact skin — is produced by mechanisms that have nothing in common with each other. Cold can do it, a pathogen can do it, an impact can do it, and a storage atmosphere can do it, and the resulting depression carries no record of which.
Among the causes, one dominates the practical picture. In produce of tropical and subtropical origin — cucumber, sweet pepper, citrus, avocado, mango — surface pitting is one of the characteristic expressions of chilling injury, and it is by a wide margin the most common reason pitting is seen in those commodities. This means that a page about pitting and a page about chilling injury necessarily overlap, and the overlap is by design rather than by oversight: pitting is a symptom that chilling injury commonly produces, and chilling injury is the cause that pitting most commonly indicates. Neither statement licenses reading the symptom backwards to the cause in an individual lot.
A symptom name that sounds like a diagnosis
A record that reads "pitting" has documented that depressions were seen. It has not identified a disorder, established a mechanism, or located a failure in the chain — though the word is confident enough that it is routinely treated as though it had. The underlying event is the same in every case: cells below the skin lose integrity, the tissue beneath collapses, and the surface sinks. What killed those cells is the entire question, and the pit is silent on it.
- Chilling injury
- In chilling-sensitive commodities, holding below the tolerated temperature but above freezing disorders membranes and metabolism, and localised cell collapse expresses as surface pitting. This is much the most common cause in tropical and subtropical produce, and it usually appears only after return to warm conditions.
- Pathogens
- Several rots begin as small, firm, sunken lesions before any sporulation or soft breakdown is visible, so early infection presents as pitting and is regularly recorded as a physiological disorder.
- Physical and handling damage
- Impact, abrasion, compression in a stack, and pressure against packaging all collapse cells locally beneath skin that remains unbroken, giving sunken marks that darken as the damaged tissue browns.
- Controlled-atmosphere injury
- An atmosphere carrying too much carbon dioxide or too little oxygen for the commodity injures tissue, and surface pitting is among the presentations that follow.
Why this overlaps chilling injury on purpose
In cucumber, sweet pepper, citrus, avocado, and mango, chilling injury is the reason pitting is usually seen. These are commodities of tropical and subtropical origin that are progressively disordered by temperatures well above their freezing point, and localised cell collapse showing as surface pitting is one of the ways that disorder expresses itself. Anyone finding pitting in these commodities after cold holding is right to look at temperature history first — that is where the answer most often is.
But "most often" is a statement about a population of lots, and it does not resolve an individual one. The commonest cause is not the only cause, and reasoning from prevalence to a particular consignment is how early rots get written off as cold damage and how compression damage in a badly stacked pallet gets blamed on a cold chain that was running correctly. The overlap between this entry and chilling injury reflects a real relationship in the world; it does not convert a symptom into evidence. The chilling-injury entry sets out the mechanism, the delayed expression on warming, and the temperature records needed to establish it — that is where a suspected chilling cause is properly pursued.
What the pattern suggests, and what it cannot settle
Although a single pit is uninformative, the distribution of pitting across a unit and across a lot carries hints worth following. These are hypotheses about where to look next, not tests, and every one of them has a common exception.
| Pattern observed | Suggests looking at | Why it does not settle it |
|---|---|---|
| Widespread, fairly even pitting across the lot | A temperature or atmosphere condition affecting the whole store | A lot handled roughly at one transfer point can also be damaged throughout |
| Pitting concentrated on contact faces and pallet edges | Compression, packaging pressure, or handling damage | Store cold spots and air discharge also track position, giving the same localisation |
| Pits enlarging and softening over time | A pathogen developing from an early lesion | Chilling-injured tissue is readily colonised, so a rot may be secondary to a physiological cause |
| Pitting appearing after warming, absent in the cold | Chilling injury, which characteristically expresses on warming | Latent handling damage and early infections also become visible with time and warmth |
The recurring lesson is that the information which separates these causes is not in the fruit surface. It is in the temperature record, the atmosphere record, the handling history, and where necessary a laboratory that can say whether an organism is present. A pitting observation is the start of that enquiry, and treating it as the end is the error the name encourages.
Reducing the risk
Because pitting has several causes, no single control addresses it, and pursuing the wrong one is a real cost — a chain that responds to chilling-caused pitting by improving packaging, or to compression-caused pitting by raising store temperature, has spent effort and fixed nothing. The measures below act on the different causes, and which of them is relevant depends on what the records show.
- Hold chilling-sensitive commodities within their own temperature tolerance through every link of the chain, since this addresses much the most common cause in tropical and subtropical produce.
- Keep temperature records continuous enough that a symptom seen after warming can be traced to the leg that caused it, since chilling expression is delayed.
- Reduce mechanical damage at transfers and in stacking, and use packaging that limits compression and contact pressure, where handling is implicated.
- Specify and monitor controlled atmospheres against sourced guidance for the commodity, since an unsuitable atmosphere injures tissue and pits it.
- Handle a suspected pathogen cause as a pathology question — early rot lesions present as pitting and require laboratory confirmation, not visual assessment.
- Segregate commodities with incompatible temperature requirements rather than running one store at a compromise setting that pits the sensitive ones.
Relationships
Evidence-backed connections in the knowledge graph.
Scope & limitations
Geographic scope: Global, wherever chilling-sensitive produce moves through cold chains. The dominant cause shifts with the commodity and the chain: chilling injury leads in tropical and subtropical produce, while handling and atmosphere causes are proportionally more important where cold management is already well controlled.
- This entry gives no temperatures, atmosphere compositions, durations, or thresholds. Tolerances are commodity-, cultivar-, and maturity-specific and are set by sourced post-harvest guidance.
- Because pitting has several unrelated causes, nothing here identifies which one affects a given lot; the entry frames the question and does not answer it from appearance.
- Symptom descriptions and distribution patterns are indicative only. They do not confirm a cause, and this entry is not a basis for accepting, rejecting, or apportioning liability for a consignment.
- Where a pathogen cause is suspected, identification requires a competent laboratory; no fungicide, treatment, or application procedure is described here.
Sources
This article draws on the following authoritative sources. See our sources & methodology for how they are selected.
- [1]FAO — Food and Agriculture Organization (opens in a new tab)Authoritative
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Cited for: Post-harvest handling of tropical and subtropical produce and chilling sensitivity
- Type:
- Intergovernmental organization
- Jurisdiction:
- Global
- Accessed:
- 2026-07-12
- [2]USDA ARS — Agricultural Research Service (opens in a new tab)Authoritative
USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
Cited for: Surface pitting as a symptom of chilling injury and commodity storage recommendations
- Type:
- Government agency
- Jurisdiction:
- United States
- Accessed:
- 2026-07-12
- [3]UC Statewide Integrated Pest Management Program (UC IPM) (opens in a new tab)High
University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources (UC ANR)
Cited for: Post-harvest physiological disorders and decay identification in fresh produce
- Type:
- University extension service
- Jurisdiction:
- United States (California)
- Accessed:
- 2026-07-12
- [4]Cornell CALS — Plant pathology and crop resources (opens in a new tab)High
Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Cited for: Symptom expression of chilling injury and mechanical damage in stored produce
- Type:
- University extension service
- Jurisdiction:
- United States (New York)
- Accessed:
- 2026-07-12