AgricultureID

Commodity · Root and tuber commodity

Cassava Roots

Also known as: Manioc roots, Fresh cassava, Tapioca root, Yuca

Cassava roots are the starchy storage roots lifted from the cassava plant. They are bulky, high in water, and deteriorate within days of harvest, so the fresh root is traded over short distances while most of the crop is processed near where it is grown.

Dated referenceLast reviewed: 2026-07-13Updated: 2026-07-13
Illustrative diagram · AgricultureID (original)

Cassava roots are the harvested commodity of the cassava plant: swollen storage roots, rich in starch, lifted by hand or by lifter and detached from the stem. Unlike the potato, which is a stem tuber, the cassava root is a true root — it carries no buds, cannot be replanted, and once severed from the plant it has no dormancy to fall back on.

That biology dominates the trade. The fresh root is heavy, wet, and short-lived, so the commercial reality of cassava is that the root is usually converted close to where it was lifted, into dried chips, starch, flour, or fermented foods, and it is those derived products that travel. A page about the cassava commodity is therefore largely a page about how quickly the root must be dealt with, and what it is turned into.

What the commodity is

The traded root is a tapered, starch-filled organ with a thin outer periderm and a thicker cortex enclosing the starchy parenchyma, plus a central fibrous strand. The peel fractions and the flesh separate readily, which is why peeling is the first operation in almost every processing route and why peel accumulates as a distinct residual stream at processing sites.

Cassava varieties are grouped in trade as sweet or bitter types. The distinction is not a flavour note but a compositional one: it reflects how much cyanogenic glycoside the root carries, and it governs which processing route a lot must take before it can be eaten. Buyers therefore care about type as well as about size and soundness.

Perishability and the processing window

Cassava is among the most perishable of the starchy staples. Within a very short time of lifting, the root begins post-harvest physiological deterioration — a vascular discolouration, spreading from wounds and from the cut end, that renders the flesh unacceptable well before any microbial rot takes hold. Microbial spoilage then follows. Mechanical damage during lifting accelerates both, because deterioration starts at wounds.

There is no equivalent of the potato store for fresh cassava at commercial scale. The practical response is speed: roots move from field to processing within a narrow window, and the trade is organised around proximity rather than around storage. Where fresh roots are sold, chains are short and local. Drying, starch extraction, and fermentation all serve to convert a perishable root into a stable, transportable product.

Cyanogenic glycosides and the need for processing

Cassava roots naturally contain cyanogenic glycosides, and it is a settled point of food science that these must be reduced by adequate processing before the root is consumed. This is not an incidental quality matter — it is the reason cassava processing exists in the forms it does. Peeling, grating, soaking, fermenting, pressing, drying, and cooking, used in the combinations traditional to each product, are the operations by which the raw root becomes food.

How much processing a lot needs depends on the variety type, and bitter types are handled through more thorough routes than sweet ones. AgricultureID states this at reference level only: it publishes no compositional limits and no processing procedures, because both are matters for national food-safety authorities and for the applicable food standard, not for an encyclopaedia entry.

Uses and product pathways

Cassava supports several genuinely distinct pathways from the same root. Wet processing extracts starch, which serves food and a wide range of industrial users. Fermented and dried food routes produce gari and related granular and flour products, particularly across West Africa. Drying and chipping produces a stable chip traded for feed compounding and for fermentation feedstock, including ethanol. Peel, generated in volume wherever roots are processed, is a residual stream that is put to feed use rather than simply discarded.

  • Food — fermented and dried products such as gari, and starch for food use
  • Industrial — native and modified starch for non-food users
  • Feed — dried chips and pellets, and processing residues
  • Energy — fermentation feedstock for ethanol production

Quality attributes and trade

Fresh cassava is not graded through anything like the elaborate national standards applied to cereals. Buyers at a processing gate assess root size and shape, freedom from mechanical damage, absence of vascular streaking, and the time elapsed since lifting — with the last of these often decisive. Starch factories additionally value dry matter, since it determines how much product a delivery yields, and reject consignments that have waited too long.

Because the fresh root travels poorly, international trade in cassava is dominated by derived products rather than by the commodity described on this page. Statistics for "cassava" in trade data usually refer to dried, chipped, or starch forms; the fresh root itself moves in local and regional chains.

Relationships

Evidence-backed connections in the knowledge graph.

Primary products

The main intended outputs of transforming this commodity.

By-products

Residual outputs of lower value that the process is not run to produce, many of which still have feed, fibre, or energy uses.

Scope & limitations

Geographic scope: Global, with production concentrated in the tropics. Food standards governing cassava products are jurisdiction-specific.

  • This entry describes the commodity in reference terms; it is not a food-safety instruction, processing method, or compliance statement.
  • No compositional, cyanogenic-glycoside, dry-matter, or holding-time figures are given here — these are matters for the applicable food standard and national authority.
  • Trade statistics reported for cassava usually cover dried and processed forms rather than the fresh root described here.
  • Regions are named to indicate where cassava is grown and where its products move, not to rank them by volume.

Sources

This article draws on the following authoritative sources. See our sources & methodology for how they are selected.

  1. [1]FAO — Food and Agriculture Organization (opens in a new tab)

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

    Authoritative

    Cited for: Cassava as a commodity, processing requirement, and food uses

    Type:
    Intergovernmental organization
    Jurisdiction:
    Global
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  2. [2]IITA — CGIAR research center (tropical crop breeding) (opens in a new tab)

    International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)

    High

    Cited for: Cassava root handling, deterioration, and West African processing routes

    Type:
    Research institute
    Jurisdiction:
    Sub-Saharan Africa / Global
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  3. [3]Embrapa — Brazilian agricultural research corporation (opens in a new tab)

    Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa)

    High

    Cited for: Cassava root processing and starch pathway context

    Type:
    Research institute
    Jurisdiction:
    Brazil
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  4. [4]FAOSTAT — FAO statistical database (opens in a new tab)

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

    Authoritative

    Cited for: Commodity item classification and coverage

    Type:
    Intergovernmental organization
    Jurisdiction:
    Global
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12

Reported trade, 2022

What reporting countries declared to FAO for Cassava; fresh (FAOSTAT item 125, CPC 01520.01) in 2022. A dated snapshot of one dataset — not a current or authoritative measure of this market.

Top reporting exporters4 of 4 reporters that declared exports of Cassava; fresh in 2022, descending by quantity.
ReporterQuantity (t)Value (1000 USD)Flags
Lao People's Democratic Republic2,367,063.64648,829A 3
Myanmar17,162.758,004A 3
Timor-Leste243.4114A 2
Angola59.3687A 3 · I 1
Top reporting importers4 of 4 reporters that declared imports of Cassava; fresh in 2022, descending by quantity.
ReporterQuantity (t)Value (1000 USD)Flags
Angola3,160.63249A 4
Lao People's Democratic Republic39.125A 2
Timor-Leste1.768A 2
Lesotho0.020A 1
A
Official figure
I
Value imputed by a receiving agency

Counts are the number of partner rows carrying each flag in the reporter’s total. A flag not listed for a reporter had no rows.

World totals, 2022

Reporter and partner codes >= 5000 are FAOSTAT aggregates (World, Western Europe, …) and are EXCLUDED. World totals here are recomputed by summing real reporters, not read from FAOSTAT’s own "World" row.

Reported exports (t)
2,384,529.15
Reported imports (t)
3,201.51
Reported export value (1000 USD)
657,034
Reported import value (1000 USD)
282

Mirror gap: -99.9%

Reported world imports and reported world exports of the same commodity disagree by 99.9% of reported exports by quantity — importers reported less than exporters reported shipping. This disagreement is a property of the data, not an error in it: the two sides are independent declarations by different customs authorities, and re-exports can count a consignment more than once along its route.

Scope & limitations

Reported trade statistics describe what reporting countries declared, not what physically moved. Reporter and partner figures for the same flow routinely disagree, re-exports can double-count a consignment along its route, low-value and informal trade is under-reported, and historical values are revised. Figures here are a versioned snapshot of one dataset, not a current or authoritative measure of a market.

Bilateral partner-level rows are summed over partners to a reporter total per item-year-flow. No interpolation, gap-filling, or estimation is applied; missing reporter-years are simply absent.

FAO. FAOSTAT Detailed Trade Matrix. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Source: FAOSTAT — Detailed Trade Matrix (Trade_DetailedTradeMatrix_E_All_Data_(Normalized)) (opens in a new tab). Licence: CC BY 4.0 (opens in a new tab). Dataset version 2025-12-18, retrieved 2026-07-16. Values are nominal US dollars as reported, not deflated.