AgricultureID

Commodity · Fibre commodity

Flax Fibre

Also known as: Linen fibre, Scutched flax, Flax tow and line

Flax fibre is the bast fibre of the flax stem, freed from the woody core by retting and separated by scutching. It is the fibre of linen, and it comes from fibre-type flax — a different crop type from the linseed grown for its oilseed.

Dated referenceLast reviewed: 2026-07-13Updated: 2026-07-13
Illustrative diagram · AgricultureID (original)

Flax fibre is a bast fibre: it comes from bundles running lengthwise in the outer stem of the flax plant, where they serve the living plant as structural support. Getting them out is not a matter of cutting or combing something off a surface, as with cotton, but of dismantling a stem — dissolving the natural glue that binds the fibre bundles to the woody core, then breaking that core away.

The commodity that results is graded on length, fineness, colour, and cleanliness, and its quality is decided largely by how well one step — retting — was judged. Flax fibre supports the linen textile trade and a growing technical market, and it is one of the oldest traded fibres in continuous use.

Fibre flax and linseed: one species, two crops

Flax is grown either for fibre or for seed, and the two are distinct crop types with distinct commodities at the end. Fibre flax is bred and grown to produce a tall, slender, unbranched stem — long stems mean long fibre bundles — and it is sown densely to suppress branching. Linseed, grown for the oilseed, is shorter and branched, because the object is to set seed rather than to build stem.

A grower chooses between these ends rather than getting both. A fibre crop harvested for seed sacrifices the stem quality that makes the fibre worth having; a linseed crop’s straw yields fibre that is short, coarse, and hard to process. Some fibre from linseed straw does find technical uses, but it is not a substitute for the fibre-type crop, and the two are not the same commodity.

Pulling, retting, and scutching

Fibre flax is pulled rather than cut. The fibre bundles run the full length of the stem and continue toward the root, so cutting at stubble height would throw away usable length and leave an uneven butt end. Pulling machines lift whole plants and lay them in a swath, preserving the full stem.

Retting is the controlled step that everything else depends on. The fibre bundles are cemented to the woody core and to each other by pectins, and retting uses microbial and enzymatic action to break those pectins down so the fibre can be separated. In dew retting, the pulled swath is left lying in the field and the work is done by field micro-organisms under weather the grower does not control; water retting, historically important, submerges the straw instead. Judgement here is everything: under-retted straw will not give up its fibre and scutches badly, while over-retting attacks the fibre itself, weakening and darkening it. Retting cannot be undone in either direction.

Retted straw is then baled and taken to a scutching mill, where it is broken and beaten to shatter the woody core and shake it out. This yields long, aligned line flax; the shorter, tangled fibre separated alongside it is tow, a genuine second stream with its own uses; and the shattered woody core falls out as shive. Hackling — combing the line flax — refines it further and produces more tow.

Quality attributes and defects

Flax fibre is bought on length, fineness, strength, colour, and cleanliness, and — unusually among fibre commodities — much of its assessment remains a matter of expert handling and appearance rather than instrument readings alone. Colour is read as a record of retting: a well-retted, evenly weathered fibre has a characteristic even tone, while patchiness signals a swath that retted unevenly.

  • Under-retted fibre that resists separation and carries adhering core
  • Over-retted fibre, weak and dark
  • Uneven retting across the swath
  • Excess shive and dust left after scutching
  • Short, tangled, or broken fibre reducing the line fraction
  • Weathering damage from a swath caught by poor weather

Grading is by trade convention and buyer specification rather than by a single international standard, and the terms used vary between the European growing regions that dominate fibre-flax supply. This entry reproduces no grade tables.

Uses and accompanying streams

Line flax is spun into linen yarn for apparel and household textiles, the market that has carried the fibre for millennia. Tow goes to coarser yarns, twines, and — increasingly — to nonwoven and composite applications, where flax is used as a reinforcement fibre rather than a textile one. Technical and composite demand has made the short-fibre stream more valuable than it once was.

Shive, the woody core broken out at scutching, leaves the mill in large volume and is put to use as animal bedding, particleboard furnish, and fuel. It is a low-value residual relative to the fibre and is modelled here as a by-product of flax fibre production.

Relationships

Evidence-backed connections in the knowledge graph.

Harvested from

By-products

Residual outputs of lower value that the process is not run to produce, many of which still have feed, fibre, or energy uses.

Scope & limitations

Geographic scope: Global, with fibre-flax production concentrated in a small number of temperate regions. Grading conventions are regional and contractual.

  • This entry describes the commodity in reference terms; it is not a grading determination, processing specification, or customs classification.
  • No fibre yields, retting durations, length or fineness figures, or line-to-tow ratios are given here — all are variety-, season-, and mill-specific.
  • Grading terminology for flax varies between regions and buyers; no grade tables are reproduced.
  • Fibre-flax production is concentrated in few regions; those named are indicative of where it matters, not a ranking.

Sources

This article draws on the following authoritative sources. See our sources & methodology for how they are selected.

  1. [1]FAO — Food and Agriculture Organization (opens in a new tab)

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

    Authoritative

    Cited for: Flax fibre as a traded bast fibre and its processing route

    Type:
    Intergovernmental organization
    Jurisdiction:
    Global
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  2. [2]European Commission — Agriculture and rural development (opens in a new tab)

    European Commission, Directorate-General for Agriculture

    Authoritative

    Cited for: Fibre flax sector, growing regions, and processing context

    Type:
    Government agency
    Jurisdiction:
    European Union
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  3. [3]CABI Digital Library — Crop Protection Compendium (opens in a new tab)

    CABI (Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International)

    High

    Cited for: Fibre flax and linseed as distinct crop types of one species

    Type:
    Reference database
    Jurisdiction:
    Global
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  4. Moderate

    Cited for: Retting, scutching, and hackling as fibre preparation steps

    Type:
    Reference database
    Jurisdiction:
    Global
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12

Crops

Machinery

Processing

Commodity Products

Reported trade, 2022

What reporting countries declared to FAO for Flax; raw or retted (FAOSTAT item 771, CPC 01929.01) in 2022. A dated snapshot of one dataset — not a current or authoritative measure of this market.

Missing from this ranking: Belarus, Russian Federation, Slovakia

  • Belarus reported 86.09 t of Flax; raw or retted exports in 2021 — rank 9 among reporters that year — but did not report exports for 2022. It is therefore absent from the 2022 table below.
  • Russian Federation reported 52.85 t of Flax; raw or retted exports in 2021 — rank 10 among reporters that year — but did not report exports for 2022. It is therefore absent from the 2022 table below.
  • Slovakia reported 104.61 t of Flax; raw or retted exports in 2020 — rank 10 among reporters that year — but did not report exports for 2022. It is therefore absent from the 2022 table below.

A country absent from a reference year is not a country with zero trade. Read the ranking below as “largest reporters that declared in 2022”, not as “largest traders”.

Top reporting exporters12 of 28 reporters that declared exports of Flax; raw or retted in 2022, descending by quantity.
ReporterQuantity (t)Value (1000 USD)Flags
France17,686.6312,818A 8
Egypt4,242.618,484A 9 · I 1
Belgium1,253.842,684A 13
Canada685.84708A 10
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland489.42111A 8
India397.621,397A 8
Romania71.23138A 19
Poland50.574A 2
United States of America46.64565A 7
Austria18.8411A 2
Türkiye1617A 16
United Arab Emirates7.4825A 10
Top reporting importers12 of 56 reporters that declared imports of Flax; raw or retted in 2022, descending by quantity.
ReporterQuantity (t)Value (1000 USD)Flags
Belgium29,087.916,578A 6
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)2,080.29168A 27
Kazakhstan1,164.0259A 1
Austria999.81156A 6
France781.462,418A 8
Italy715.923,503A 4
China; mainland458.91586A 1
Switzerland324.58104A 6
Croatia186.58175A 2
Spain164.13525A 3
Czechia108.69103A 2
Egypt85.94323A 1 · I 2
A
Official figure
I
Value imputed by a receiving agency

Counts are the number of partner rows carrying each flag in the reporter’s total. A flag not listed for a reporter had no rows.

World totals, 2022

Reporter and partner codes >= 5000 are FAOSTAT aggregates (World, Western Europe, …) and are EXCLUDED. World totals here are recomputed by summing real reporters, not read from FAOSTAT’s own "World" row.

Reported exports (t)
24,980.77
Reported imports (t)
36,464.01
Reported export value (1000 USD)
27,118
Reported import value (1000 USD)
25,488

Mirror gap: +46%

Reported world imports and reported world exports of the same commodity disagree by 46% of reported exports by quantity — importers reported more than exporters reported shipping. This disagreement is a property of the data, not an error in it: the two sides are independent declarations by different customs authorities, and re-exports can count a consignment more than once along its route.

Scope & limitations

Reported trade statistics describe what reporting countries declared, not what physically moved. Reporter and partner figures for the same flow routinely disagree, re-exports can double-count a consignment along its route, low-value and informal trade is under-reported, and historical values are revised. Figures here are a versioned snapshot of one dataset, not a current or authoritative measure of a market.

Bilateral partner-level rows are summed over partners to a reporter total per item-year-flow. No interpolation, gap-filling, or estimation is applied; missing reporter-years are simply absent.

FAO. FAOSTAT Detailed Trade Matrix. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Source: FAOSTAT — Detailed Trade Matrix (Trade_DetailedTradeMatrix_E_All_Data_(Normalized)) (opens in a new tab). Licence: CC BY 4.0 (opens in a new tab). Dataset version 2025-12-18, retrieved 2026-07-16. Values are nominal US dollars as reported, not deflated.