AgricultureID

Processing Method · Processing method

Hammer Milling

Also known as: Impact milling, Hammer grinding

Hammer milling pulverises grain by impact and holds it in the chamber until it passes a screen. It makes no attempt to separate the kernel’s fractions — everything that went in leaves together as meal, which is exactly what feed and many food uses want.

Dated referenceLast reviewed: 2026-07-13Updated: 2026-07-13
Illustrative diagram · AgricultureID (original)

A hammer mill reduces grain by hitting it. Swinging hammers on a rotor strike the kernels and throw them against the chamber wall and against each other, and the fragments stay in circulation until they are small enough to pass through a perforated screen. The screen, not the hammers, is what decides how fine the meal is: nothing leaves until it fits.

The defining feature is what the method does not do. It does not part bran from endosperm, and it does not set the germ aside. Impact shatters every fraction of the kernel together and the screen releases them together, so a hammer mill has one outlet and one stream. That is not a limitation to be worked around — for animal feed and for many meals and flours, retaining the whole kernel is the objective, and a machine that separates fractions would be solving a problem nobody has.

Objective and principle

Hammer milling exists to reduce grain to a specified particle size, cheaply and without regard to which part of the kernel a particle came from. In feed manufacture, particle size governs how well an animal can digest the ration and how the meal behaves in later mixing and pelleting; in food use, it decides the texture of the meal. In both cases the requirement is a size, not a composition.

The principle is impact fracture. Hammers moving at speed transfer energy to a kernel faster than it can deform, and it shatters. Fragments continue to be struck and to strike one another until they pass the screen, which means the mill is as much a classifier as a grinder — material is retained by size and released by size. Grain that resists fracture simply stays in the chamber longer.

What comes out

One stream leaves a hammer mill: meal, carrying the whole kernel. Where the grain is maize, that meal is cornmeal — the whole-grain, non-degermed kind, which is a different product from the degermed cornmeal a dry-milling plant produces even though both carry the same name. Where the grain is barley or sorghum, the meal is generally destined for feed or for local food use and is not traded as a distinct product entity in this reference.

Whole-grain meal
The kernel reduced to a specified particle size with bran, germ, and endosperm all present. The single product stream of the process.
Germ retained
The germ is shattered into the meal rather than recovered. Its oil stays in the product, which is why hammer-milled whole meals do not keep as long as degermed ones.
No by-product stream
Nothing is set aside, so the mill generates no bran or germ fraction to place in another market. The whole kernel is the product.

Quality effects and loss points

The mill controls particle size and its distribution, and little else. Composition arrives with the grain and leaves unchanged. Screen aperture, hammer condition, and tip speed together set how fine the meal is and how wide the spread of sizes around it — and the spread matters, because a meal ground fine enough to satisfy one requirement almost always carries fines that create dust and handling problems downstream.

Losses here are not fractions leaving in the wrong stream, since there is only one stream. They are dust, heat, and the keeping quality of a product that still contains its germ oil.

  • Dust generation, which is both a material loss and the mill’s headline hazard
  • Heat pickup during grinding, which bears on the condition of germ oil in the meal
  • Worn hammers and damaged screens widening the particle-size distribution
  • Shortened keeping quality of whole meal relative to a degermed product
  • Spillage at feed and discharge

Environmental context and safety

Hammer milling is energy-demanding, and its energy demand rises steeply as the target particle size falls — finer meal costs disproportionately more to make than a coarse one. It produces no residual stream to place, because the whole kernel is retained. Dust extraction is simultaneously an air-quality measure, a product-recovery measure, and a safety measure.

Relationships

Evidence-backed connections in the knowledge graph.

Scope & limitations

Geographic scope: Global. Hammer mills are used at every scale, from village-level custom milling to industrial feed manufacture.

  • A reference description of the process, not a milling specification or operating instruction.
  • No screen apertures, tip speeds, particle-size targets, or energy figures are given — they are mill-, grain-, and contract-specific.
  • Barley and sorghum meals are within scope as inputs, but are not modelled here as distinct traded product entities; only maize meal is.
  • Cornmeal from a hammer mill is the whole-grain kind; it shares a name but not a specification with the degermed cornmeal of a dry-milling plant.

Sources

This article draws on the following authoritative sources. See our sources & methodology for how they are selected.

  1. [1]FAO — Food and Agriculture Organization (opens in a new tab)

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

    Authoritative

    Cited for: Cereal size reduction and meal product context

    Type:
    Intergovernmental organization
    Jurisdiction:
    Global
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  2. [2]National Academies Press — Nutrient Requirements series (opens in a new tab)

    National Research Council, U.S. National Academies

    High

    Cited for: Particle size and feed ingredient processing

    Type:
    Peer-reviewed literature
    Jurisdiction:
    Global
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  3. [3]USDA ARS — Agricultural Research Service (opens in a new tab)

    USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS)

    Authoritative

    Cited for: Grain milling and particle-size research

    Type:
    Government agency
    Jurisdiction:
    United States
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  4. [4]IITA — CGIAR research center (tropical crop breeding) (opens in a new tab)

    International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)

    High

    Cited for: Maize and sorghum meal processing in smallholder contexts

    Type:
    Research institute
    Jurisdiction:
    Sub-Saharan Africa / Global
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12