AgricultureID

Crop · Forage crop

Sainfoin

Onobrychis viciifolia

Also known as: Esparcet, Holy hay

Sainfoin is a forage legume that does not cause bloat. Its condensed tannins bind protein in the rumen, which removes the foam that kills animals on clover and changes how the protein is digested.

Dated referenceLast reviewed: 2026-09-02Updated: 2026-09-02
Illustrative diagram · AgricultureID (original)

Almost every high-protein forage legume carries a bloat risk, and grazing management on clover and alfalfa is substantially the management of that risk. Sainfoin does not: the condensed tannins throughout its tissue bind soluble protein in the rumen and collapse the stable foam that bloat consists of.

That single property is why a legume with modest yield and demanding establishment persists in cultivation at all, and why interest in it rises whenever the costs of bloat, of nitrogen fertiliser, or of anthelmintic resistance rise.

What the tannins do in the rumen

Condensed tannins bind soluble protein and collapse the stable protein foam that causes pasture bloat, which is why sainfoin can be grazed pure without the intake management a clover sward requires. The same binding carries protein past the rumen undegraded, so more reaches the small intestine as bypass protein.

Management combines resistant varieties, rotation, monitoring, and — where justified — locally authorized control products applied according to their labels.

Sainfoin among the tannin legumes

Sainfoin is generally regarded as the most useful of the tannin-containing forage legumes because it combines a high capacity to bind protein with comparatively little inhibition of cellulose digestion by rumen bacteria. Tannins that bind protein well but also suppress fibre digestion trade one benefit for another; sainfoin largely does not.

Effect on gastrointestinal nematodes

Tannin-containing forages including sainfoin reduce faecal egg output of gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing ruminants, and controlled feeding studies have measured substantial reductions against Haemonchus contortus. This is a supporting measure within a parasite programme rather than a treatment, and it does not replace veterinary control.

A calcareous-soil crop

Sainfoin evolved on chalk and limestone and performs on shallow, alkaline, free-draining ground where alfalfa is marginal and clover fails. It is intolerant of acid soils and of waterlogging, and a wet winter on heavy land is the most common cause of a lost stand.

Soil suitability should be assessed with local soil survey information and, where available, field testing.

Establishment is the difficulty

Seed is large and is often sown still in the pod, which changes the seed rate calculation and the drill setting. Seedlings are slow and poorly competitive, so a weedy or cloddy seedbed loses the stand before it establishes, and sainfoin is normally sown into clean ground rather than undersown.

Cutting and persistence

Sainfoin regrows from crown buds and is intolerant of frequent close cutting; two cuts a year suit it where three would suit alfalfa. Stands are shorter-lived than alfalfa and thin progressively, which is the main reason it is grown in rotation rather than as long-term ley.

Pollination and seed

The flowers are showy and strongly attractive to bees, and seed set depends on insect visits. That makes sainfoin a deliberate choice in pollinator-supporting systems as well as a forage, and it makes seed production dependent on pollinator populations in the same way as red clover.

Hay and silage

Sainfoin dries readily and makes hay well, and the tannins reduce protein breakdown during ensiling, which is the opposite of the difficulty red clover presents. Leaf shatter in over-dry hay is the main conservation loss, so it is turned less and baled at higher moisture than a grass hay.

Rotational role

As a legume it fixes its own nitrogen and leaves a residue for the following crop, and because it is grown on the poorer calcareous soils that residue is often the main reason for including it. Applied nitrogen suppresses fixation and is not used on an established stand.

Fertilizer rates, timing, and forms should follow local soil tests and regional guidance. AgricultureID does not publish universal fertilizer recommendations.

Botanical identity

Species
Accepted name
Onobrychis viciifolia
Family
Fabaceae
Genus
Onobrychis
Harvested part
forage biomass
Agricultural use
forage, animal feed
Crop group
Forage and pasture

What the authorities say

Plants of the World Online
Onobrychis viciifolia

Botanical identity here is what the consulted taxonomic authorities publish, on the date they were read. Where authorities disagree, both readings are shown rather than one being chosen silently.

Verified crop taxa

What AgricultureID holds for this crop

  • 3 soil references
  • 2 climate references

Not held

  • No crop calendar records source exists not mapped
  • No published cultivars not researched
  • No official variety registrations source exists not mapped
  • No verified extension resources source exists not ingested
  • No pests and diseases naming this crop as a host source exists not ingested
  • No farm economics observations source exists not mapped
  • No market price series source exists not mapped
  • No related crops not applicable

An absence here means this corpus holds no such record, not that none exists.

Verified crop taxa

Part of

Fabaceae — the legume family · Forage and pasture crops

Tools for this

Each tool shows its formula, constants and sources, and starts empty — nothing is filled in from this page.

Relationships

Evidence-backed connections in the knowledge graph.

Scope & limitations

Geographic scope: Temperate calcareous regions of Europe, Central Asia and North America. Cultivar recommendations and cutting regimes are national.

Climate context: Temperate; drought-tolerant on shallow calcareous soils and intolerant of acidity and waterlogging.

  • Condensed tannin content varies with cultivar, growth stage and environment; no concentration is given here.
  • Anthelmintic effects are supporting measures within a parasite-management programme and are not a treatment; veterinary guidance governs.
  • Stand life expectations vary widely with soil, cutting frequency and winter conditions.

Sources

This article draws on the following authoritative sources. See our sources & methodology for how they are selected.

  1. [1]FAO — Food and Agriculture Organization (opens in a new tab)

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

    Authoritative

    Cited for: Forage legume production context

    Type:
    Intergovernmental organization
    Jurisdiction:
    Global
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  2. [2]USDA ARS — Agricultural Research Service (opens in a new tab)

    USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS)

    Authoritative

    Cited for: Condensed tannin forage legume research

    Type:
    Government agency
    Jurisdiction:
    United States
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  3. [3]AHDB — Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (opens in a new tab)

    Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB)

    High

    Cited for: Forage legume agronomy and conservation

    Type:
    Government agency
    Jurisdiction:
    United Kingdom
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  4. [4]USDA PLANTS Database (opens in a new tab)

    USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)

    Authoritative

    Cited for: Classification and nomenclature

    Type:
    Reference database
    Jurisdiction:
    United States
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  5. [5]CABI Digital Library — Crop Protection Compendium (opens in a new tab)

    CABI (Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International)

    High

    Cited for: Onobrychis viciifolia compendium data

    Type:
    Reference database
    Jurisdiction:
    Global
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12