AgricultureID

Crop · Forage crop

Birdsfoot Trefoil

Lotus corniculatus

Also known as: Bird’s-foot trefoil

Birdsfoot trefoil is the tannin legume for ground that defeats the others — wet, acid, infertile — and it is bloat-safe for the same reason sainfoin is, on soils sainfoin cannot tolerate.

Dated referenceLast reviewed: 2026-09-02Updated: 2026-09-02
Illustrative diagram · AgricultureID (original)

Alfalfa needs deep, well-drained, near-neutral soil; sainfoin needs calcareous, free-draining ground. Birdsfoot trefoil needs neither, and persists on wet, acid, low-fertility land where both fail. That tolerance is why it appears in upland and marginal grazing systems rather than in cutting leys.

Like sainfoin it carries condensed tannins, so it is bloat-safe and delivers bypass protein. Unlike sainfoin it tolerates the conditions that make bloat-safe forage hardest to grow.

Bloat-safe, and why

Condensed tannins bind soluble protein in the rumen and collapse the foam that pasture bloat consists of, so trefoil can be grazed as a pure or dominant stand without the intake management a clover sward demands. The bound protein is released lower in the tract, so more reaches the small intestine.

Management combines resistant varieties, rotation, monitoring, and — where justified — locally authorized control products applied according to their labels.

Effect on nematodes

Feeding studies on tannin-containing forages, birdsfoot trefoil among them, have measured substantial reductions in faecal egg output of gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs. It is a supporting measure within a parasite-management programme and not a substitute for veterinary control.

The soils it is grown for

Trefoil tolerates waterlogging, low pH and low phosphorus better than any other common forage legume, and that tolerance rather than its yield is the reason to grow it. On good land it is outyielded by alfalfa and outcompeted by clover; on poor land it is often the only legume that persists.

Soil suitability should be assessed with local soil survey information and, where available, field testing.

Establishment and competition

Seedlings are small and slow, and trefoil establishes poorly into a vigorous grass sward — the usual failure is a stand that germinates and is then shaded out in its first summer. Sowing into a suppressed or thin sward, or with a companion grass at a reduced rate, is the standard approach.

Grazing management

Trefoil regrows from crown buds and from buds on the lower stems, so it tolerates grazing better than alfalfa but still needs a residual left behind. Rotational grazing with recovery periods maintains the stand; continuous close stocking removes the regrowth points and thins it.

Persistence by seed

Unlike most sown legumes, trefoil sets seed readily under grazing and can maintain a stand by natural reseeding where management allows some plants to flower. That is an important part of its persistence on extensive land where reseeding a sward is not economic.

Erect and prostrate types

Cultivars divide broadly into erect types suited to cutting and prostrate types suited to grazing, and the difference is real enough to change the outcome: an erect cultivar under close continuous stocking loses its growing points, while a prostrate one under a cutting regime yields poorly.

Conservation

The tannins reduce protein breakdown during ensiling, and trefoil silage ferments more predictably than a comparable clover. Leaf loss in hay is the main conservation risk, since the leaflets shatter when over-dry.

Nitrogen on poor land

Fixation proceeds on soils too acid or too wet for many rhizobia, and inoculation with the appropriate strain matters more here than for clover because trefoil is often sown onto ground with no history of it.

Fertilizer rates, timing, and forms should follow local soil tests and regional guidance. AgricultureID does not publish universal fertilizer recommendations.

Botanical identity

Species
Accepted name
Lotus corniculatus
Family
Fabaceae
Genus
Lotus
Harvested part
forage biomass
Agricultural use
forage, animal feed
Crop group
Forage and pasture

What the authorities say

Plants of the World Online
Lotus corniculatus

Botanical identity here is what the consulted taxonomic authorities publish, on the date they were read. Where authorities disagree, both readings are shown rather than one being chosen silently.

Verified crop taxa

What AgricultureID holds for this crop

  • 3 soil references
  • 2 climate references

Not held

  • No crop calendar records source exists not mapped
  • No published cultivars not researched
  • No official variety registrations source exists not mapped
  • No verified extension resources source exists not ingested
  • No pests and diseases naming this crop as a host source exists not ingested
  • No farm economics observations source exists not mapped
  • No market price series source exists not mapped
  • No related crops not applicable

An absence here means this corpus holds no such record, not that none exists.

Verified crop taxa

Part of

Fabaceae — the legume family · Forage and pasture crops

Tools for this

Each tool shows its formula, constants and sources, and starts empty — nothing is filled in from this page.

Relationships

Evidence-backed connections in the knowledge graph.

Scope & limitations

Geographic scope: Temperate regions worldwide, chiefly on marginal grazing land. Cultivar type recommendations are national.

Climate context: Temperate; tolerant of waterlogging, acidity and low fertility, and outyielded on good land.

  • Condensed tannin content varies with cultivar, growth stage and environment and is not quantified here.
  • Anthelmintic effects support a parasite-management programme rather than replacing it; veterinary guidance governs.
  • Erect and prostrate cultivar classes are national conventions and not directly comparable between recommended lists.

Sources

This article draws on the following authoritative sources. See our sources & methodology for how they are selected.

  1. [1]FAO — Food and Agriculture Organization (opens in a new tab)

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

    Authoritative

    Cited for: Forage legume production on marginal land

    Type:
    Intergovernmental organization
    Jurisdiction:
    Global
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  2. [2]USDA ARS — Agricultural Research Service (opens in a new tab)

    USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS)

    Authoritative

    Cited for: Condensed tannin forage legume research

    Type:
    Government agency
    Jurisdiction:
    United States
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  3. [3]USDA PLANTS Database (opens in a new tab)

    USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)

    Authoritative

    Cited for: Classification and nomenclature

    Type:
    Reference database
    Jurisdiction:
    United States
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  4. [4]CABI Digital Library — Crop Protection Compendium (opens in a new tab)

    CABI (Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International)

    High

    Cited for: Lotus corniculatus compendium data

    Type:
    Reference database
    Jurisdiction:
    Global
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12
  5. [5]AHDB — Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (opens in a new tab)

    Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB)

    High

    Cited for: Forage legume agronomy

    Type:
    Government agency
    Jurisdiction:
    United Kingdom
    Accessed:
    2026-07-12